You know, there are some signs you can take from the phrases that people use that usually indicate when they aren't confident in their argument or feel like they are using. Two of them that I keep hearing from political shills, particularly McCain operatives recently when talking about Palin's foreign policy experience, are the phrase 'The fact is' and '[x amount of people] agree'.
When you keep repeating 'the fact is' all you are doing is trying to convince yourself. If it is a fact, it'll stand on its own. There isn't a need to identify it as such, particularly over and over.
The second phrase is more along the lines of trying to convince someone you are right by claiming lots of people agree with you so obviously it is right. Like 'millions of Americans believe the same things as Sarah Palin so her views can't be extremist.' Wow, color me convinced.
Anyway, just thought I'd throw those observations out there. And this isn't just in politics but in any conversation or debate really. Try it on your friends!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Yes. We need someone to encourage Group Think. That's surely what we need. good grief.
And on another note...I find the white female flock to Palin vote to be embarassing. I can't pick a candidate because she has female parts. Good grief. The whole point is being respected for ideas, not gender.
Group think is interesting. I think it can be useful as far as a societal survival strategy but it can definately get in the way when it becomes a short cut for analytical thought.
As far as the female flock goes, I certainly believe that is the media narrative but I'm not sure how much that really will pan out in reality. There are some vocal people out there but I tend to believe its more fiction than fact. Guess we will find out in a couple of months.
Post a Comment